As the League of Legends MSI 2025 approaches, fans from around the world eagerly await the clash of the top teams.
With so many talented squads competing for the prestigious trophy, it’s essential to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each team. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the teams that will be facing off in the League of Legends MSI 2025 group stage.
1. Gen.G (LCK #1)
Strengths:
• Top Tier Roster: Gen.G boasts an all-star lineup, with world-class players like Chovyand Ruler who excel in their respective roles. Chovy is widely regarded as one of the best mid-laners globally, and Ruler’s AD carry performances are nothing short of elite. Their synergy and individual skill make Gen.G a formidable team.
• Consistency: They’ve demonstrated incredible consistency, not only within the LCK but also in international tournaments. Their cohesive team fights and strategic decision-making make them tough opponents to break down.
Weaknesses:
• Pressure on Ruler: While Ruler is exceptional, the team’s reliance on him for late-game carries can sometimes expose Gen.G to unpredictable results if the ADC is shut down early in a match.
• Limited Adaptability: Despite their dominance, Gen.G can struggle when they face highly unpredictable or innovative teams that use unconventional strategies. Their style, while highly effective, can sometimes be easy to read.
2. Anyone's Legend (LPL #1)
Strengths:
• Strong Mid-Jungle Synergy: The mid-jungle duo of Tarzan and Shanks is arguably one of the most formidable in the tournament. Their coordination allows them to control objectives, initiate skirmishes, and dictate the tempo of the game.
• Explosive Early Game: Anyone’s Legend excels at aggressive early-game strategies that put their opponents on the back foot. They’re not afraid to take risks and will often outmaneuver teamsin the early stages of the match.
Weaknesses:
• Over-aggression: Their playstyle can sometimes backfire when their early aggression is met with discipline from the opposition. If their early leads aren’t converted into objectives, their playstyle can fall apart in the mid-to-late game.
• Inconsistent Teamfighting: While they are strong early, their teamfighting execution can be inconsistent. If they fail to coordinate during large teamfights, they leave themselves vulnerable to more experienced teams.
3. T1 (LCK #2)
Strengths:
• Faker’s Leadership: Faker is the backbone of T1, offering unmatched leadership and experience in high-pressure situations. His ability to play multiple champions at an elite level gives T1 a versatile edge in drafting.
• Team Chemistry: With players like Gumayusiand Keria, T1 has one of the best bot-lane duos, combining synergy with aggressive playstyle. The team is adept at orchestrating plays and capitalizing on enemy mistakes.
Weaknesses:
• Struggles with Scaling: T1 can sometimes have difficulty scaling into the late game, especially if they are outmaneuvered in the early stages. Against teams that can match their tempo, they might struggle to transition effectively.
• Faker’s Risk-Taking: While Faker’s risk-taking often pays off, there are instances where overzealous plays can lead to unfavorable outcomes for the team. Against high-caliber teams, these risks could be punished.
4. Bilibili Gaming (LPL #2)
Strengths:
• Flexibility and Adaptation: Bilibili Gaming has shown an impressive ability to adapt to different team compositions and meta shifts. They have an exceptionally deep champion pool, allowing them to remain unpredictable during draft phases.
• Knight’s Carry Potential: Knight, their mid-laner, is one of the most skilled players at generating carries for his team. His ability to roam and make plays around the map sets up Bilibili’s aggressive mid-to-late game transitions.
Weaknesses:
• Inconsistent Late-Game Execution: Bilibili has sometimes struggled with closing out games when they don’t maintain control. Their mid-game can be rocky, and if they lose momentum, they can fall apart when it matters most.
• Fragile Early Game: Their reliance on mid-to-late-game scalingmeans they can sometimes be vulnerable early on. Against teams that can exploit this weakness, Bilibili may struggle to recover.
5. Movistar KOI (LEC #1)
Strengths:
• Aggressive Macro Play: Movistar KOI thrives in controlled chaos, using aggressive macro strategies to overwhelm their opponents. Their playstyle revolves around dominating key areas of the map and forcing the enemy to react.
• Strong Teamfighting: With Larssen at the helm, Movistar KOI’s teamfighting coordination is among the best. Their ability to execute complex teamfights with precision allows them to outmaneuver even stronger opponents.
Weaknesses:
• Lack of Experience on the World Stage: While Movistar KOI has been dominant in Europe, they lack the same level of experience at the international level. They could struggle against teams with greater international tournament experience.
• Inconsistent Early Game: Movistar KOI can sometimes struggle in the laning phase. Their reliance on macro strategies means they may fall behind early if they aren’t able to establish a solid lead.
6. FlyQuest (LCS #1)
Strengths:
• Innovative Strategies: FlyQuest is known for its unique and often unpredictable strategies. They bring a fresh perspective to the game and have the ability to surprise top-tier teams with unorthodox plays.
• Strong Early-Game Control: FlyQuest focuses on controlling the early game through strong jungle presence, especially with Inspired, whose decision-making and map control are top-notch.
Weaknesses:
• Limited Late-Game Carry: FlyQuest’s playstyle revolves around early-game aggression, but they sometimes struggle in the late game when games extend past 30 minutes. Their teamfighting can be weak if their early-game advantage is not carried through.
• Inconsistent Execution: FlyQuest’s biggest issue is its inconsistency. While they have the tools to compete, they can sometimes fail to execute their strategies properly, leading to missed opportunities.
7. CTBC Flying Oyster (PCS #1)
Strengths:
• Strong Individual Talent: Players like Rest and Doggo provide a powerful core to CTBC Flying Oyster. Their ability to carry games individually, especially in the laning phase, gives the team a solid foundation.
• Steady Growth: CTBC Flying Oyster has been consistently improving over the past year, adapting well to different metas and sharpening their game in high-stakes scenarios.
Weaknesses:
• Team Coordination Issues: While their individual players shine, the team sometimes struggles with coordination during major teamfights or objective control. They need to clean up their communication to compete against top-tier teams.
• Vulnerability in Early-Game Skirmishes: Their early-game can be inconsistent, and they often find themselves on the back foot in skirmishes. If they lose control of the map early, they struggle to recover.
8. G2 Esports (LEC #2)
Strengths:
• Veteran Leadership: With players like Caps and Jankos, G2 brings unmatched experience and leadership. Caps, in particular, is known for his ability to carry games from the mid-lane with both mechanical prowess and decision-making.
• Aggressive Playstyle: G2’s aggressive, in-your-face approach makes them one of the most exciting teams to watch. They’re always looking for opportunities to make plays and dictate the pace of the game.
Weaknesses:
• Overconfidence: G2’s aggressive nature can sometimes lead to overconfidence, resulting in reckless plays that cost them objectives or even games. They need to temper their aggression to ensure they don’t give up free advantages to their opponents.
• Weak Early-Game Focus: G2 tends to focus on skirmishes rather than early-game lane control, which can leave them vulnerable if they fail to make a significant impact in the early game.
9. GAM Esports (VCS #1)
Strengths:
• High-Speed Aggression: GAM Esports thrives on aggressive early-game plays, often looking to control the game through swift skirmishes and early objectives. Their speed makes them unpredictable, and they can overwhelm slower teams.
• Experienced Roster: Their players have a lot of international experience, which helps them handle pressure and make high-stakes decisions on the world stage.
Weaknesses:
• Lack of Late-Game Focus: GAM can struggle to maintain momentum into the late game, and against stronger teams, their early-game aggression may not be enough to secure a win.
• Overextension Issues:GAM’s focus on aggressive plays often leads them to overextend in teamfights or objectives, leaving themselves exposed to counterattacks.
10. FURIA (CBLOL #1)
Strengths:
• Aggressive and Unpredictable: FURIA’s playstyle revolves around aggressive, fast-paced strategies that leave little room for the opposition to react. Their unpredictability is one of their greatest assets.
• Exciting New Blood: As underdogs, FURIA has nothing to lose, which makes them a dangerous team to face. Their fresh and exciting approach to the game can catch more established teams off guard.
Weaknesses:
• Lack of Experience: FURIA’s relative inexperience at the international level means they might struggle against more seasoned teams. Their aggression could sometimes be their downfall if they’re unable to execute their strategies correctly.
• Reliance on Chaos: While their chaos-filled approach is thrilling, it’s also risky. If their opponents can match their speed and take control of the game, FURIA could easily falter.
The League of Legends MSI 2025 Looks Promising With These Awesome Teams
The League of Legends MSI 2025 promises to be a thrilling spectacle, with each team bringing their unique strengths and weaknesses to the table. Whether it’s Gen.G’s dominance, T1’s legacy, or FURIA’s unpredictability, fans are in for a wild ride as the tournament unfolds.
Be sure to read our other guide articles to keep up with what’s hot and what’s not in the gaming world. Stay tuned and catch the gaming current with GameEels as these teams face off to determine who will claim the MSI 2025 trophy and cement their place in League of Legends history!
